From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Dairy Products Corp. v. United States

U.S.
Jun 20, 1966
384 U.S. 883 (1966)

Summary

In National Dairy, as in Socony-Vacuum, the grand jury testimony was used for refreshment purposes only; in many instances, the refreshment incident ended by the witness merely saying that his recollection had not been refreshed.

Summary of this case from United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

No. 758.

Decided June 20, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 350 F.2d 321, vacated and remanded.

John T. Chadwell, Richard W. McLaren and Martin J. Purcell for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro and Raymond P. Hernacki for the United States.


The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855.


Summaries of

National Dairy Products Corp. v. United States

U.S.
Jun 20, 1966
384 U.S. 883 (1966)

In National Dairy, as in Socony-Vacuum, the grand jury testimony was used for refreshment purposes only; in many instances, the refreshment incident ended by the witness merely saying that his recollection had not been refreshed.

Summary of this case from United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.

In National Dairy, the grand jury transcript was ordered produced and, upon the government's several showings of "particularized need" in connection with seven particular witnesses, particular portions of the grand jury testimony was ordered disclosed solely for refreshment use.

Summary of this case from United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.
Case details for

National Dairy Products Corp. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORP. v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 20, 1966

Citations

384 U.S. 883 (1966)

Citing Cases

United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.

JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge. Pursuant to the mandate and per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court in…

United States v. Hughes

See United States v. Procter Gamble Co., 1958, 356 U.S. 677, 681, 78 S.Ct. 983, 2 L.Ed.2d 1077; Pittsburgh…