From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Bank of Watervliet v. Martin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 17, 1923
235 N.Y. 611 (N.Y. 1923)

Opinion

Argued March 16, 1923

Decided April 17, 1923

John J. Mackrell for appellant.

John T. Norton and Eugene McLean for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that when the note fell due the maker did not tender plaintiff bank $250 and a renewal note for $7,250; no opinion.

Concur: HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Absent: HISCOCK, Ch. J.


Summaries of

National Bank of Watervliet v. Martin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 17, 1923
235 N.Y. 611 (N.Y. 1923)
Case details for

National Bank of Watervliet v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL BANK OF WATERVLIET, Respondent, v . LEWIS MARTIN, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 17, 1923

Citations

235 N.Y. 611 (N.Y. 1923)
139 N.E. 755

Citing Cases

South Shore Securities Co. v. Goode

The law on this subject is succinctly stated in Petroleum Acceptance Corp. v. Queen Ann Laundry Service ( 265…

Petroleum Accept. Corp. v. Queen Anne Laundry Serv

Where the holder in due course of a note has knowledge that the basic contract contemplates that there is to…