holding that ERISA's anti-alienation provisions do not prohibit garnishments
Summary of this case from Mills v. MillsSubmitted September 24, 1979
Decided October 25, 1979
Motion to dismiss the appeal herein granted and the appeal dismissed for mootness, with costs and $20 costs of motion.
holding that ERISA's anti-alienation provisions do not prohibit garnishments
Summary of this case from Mills v. MillsFull title:NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH AMERICA, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 25, 1979
One state court has allowed garnishment of an ERISA pension fund for other purposes. National Bank of North…
Mills v. MillsBut Plaintiff also notes that some courts have permitted judgment creditors to enforce judgments against…