From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nathan v. Sutphen

Supreme Court of California
Dec 28, 1885
68 Cal. 267 (Cal. 1885)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order refusing a new trial.

         COUNSEL:

         Joseph H. Skirm, for Appellants.

          Charles B. Younger, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         THE COURT

         A motion is made to dismiss the appeal in this case, upon the ground that a copy of the notice of appeal was not served. It appears that after filing the notice of appeal, and on the same day, a copy of the notice was taken by a competent person to the office of the attorney for respondent, and there handed him in person. Respondent's attorney refused to take the notice, whereupon the person making the service, in the presence of the attorney and in his office, laid the copy on the table in front of which the attorney was standing, and there left it. The service was sufficient.

         Motion denied.


Summaries of

Nathan v. Sutphen

Supreme Court of California
Dec 28, 1885
68 Cal. 267 (Cal. 1885)
Case details for

Nathan v. Sutphen

Case Details

Full title:SOLOMON J. NATHAN, Respondent, v. CHARLES T. SUTPHEN et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 28, 1885

Citations

68 Cal. 267 (Cal. 1885)
9 P. 110

Citing Cases

Dreyfus v. Badger

) The application for the patent being false, the applicant was not entitled to purchase, or to receive a…

Banning Co. v. California

South Bend, 227 U.S. 544; Hall v. Wisconsin, 103 U.S. 5; Hendrick v. Lindsay, 93 U.S. 143; Louisiana R.R. v.…