From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nathan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 24, 1988
520 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 86-2801.

February 24, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, M. William Graybill, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


In this appeal from appellant's conviction of battery and affray, we find error only in that the trial court delegated to appellant's probation or community control officer the determination of the amount of restitution appellant was to make. On remand, the amount of any restitution to be imposed shall be determined by the trial court. Mansell v. State, 498 So.2d 604 (Fla.2d DCA 1986); Buchanan v. State, 483 So.2d 537 (Fla.2d DCA 1986). Appellant's convictions are otherwise affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nathan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 24, 1988
520 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Nathan v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CARL NATHAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 24, 1988

Citations

520 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Snyder v. State

Although the record indicates that the trial court intended Snyder's probation officer to establish the…