From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nash v. Rattray

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 12, 1927
216 Ala. 168 (Ala. 1927)

Opinion

7 Div. 689.

May 12, 1927.

Appeal from Circuit Court, De Kalb County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

John B. Isbell, of Ft. Payne, for appellant.

Counsel argues the questions raised and cites Code 1923, §§ 7744-7762.

Goodhue Lusk, of Gadsden, for appellee.

The questions presented cannot be considered in absence of a bill of exceptions. Pate v. Baker, 15 Ala. App. 234, 73 So. 125; Garner v. Thach, 208 Ala. 11, 93 So. 416; Mauney v. Elec. Const. Co., 210 Ala. 554, 98 So. 874; Wood v. McClure, 209 Ala. 523, 96 So. 577; Sov. Camp v. Ward, 201 Ala. 446, 78 So. 824.


Action for money had and received. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

The assignments of error relate only to the action of the court in overruling defendant's motion to suppress the depositions of certain witnesses for the plaintiff, in giving the affirmative charge for the plaintiff, and refusing a like charge requested by defendant. These assignments of error present questions which are here reviewable only by bill of exceptions. Mauney v. Elec., etc., Co., 210 Ala. 554, 98 So. 874; Sov. Camp, W. O. W., v. Ward, 201 Ala. 446, 78 So. 824; Wood v. McClure, 209 Ala. 523, 96 So. 577; Garner v. Thach, 208 Ala. 11, 93 So. 416; Allen v. Mendelsohn Son, 207 Ala. 527, 93 So. 416, 31 A.L.R. 1063. There is no bill of exceptions.

There are no assignments of error based upon the record proper. It results, therefore, that the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

SAYRE, BOULDIN, and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nash v. Rattray

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 12, 1927
216 Ala. 168 (Ala. 1927)
Case details for

Nash v. Rattray

Case Details

Full title:NASH v. RATTRAY

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 12, 1927

Citations

216 Ala. 168 (Ala. 1927)
112 So. 835