From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Narragansett Imp. Co. v. Local Union No. 251

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nov 29, 1974
506 F.2d 715 (1st Cir. 1974)

Opinion

No. 74-1248.

Argued October 9, 1974.

Decided November 29, 1974.

Dennis J. Roberts, II, Providence, R. I., with whom Roberts Wiley Inc., Providence, R.I., was on brief, for appellant.

Patrick A. Liguori, Providence, R.I., with whom Adler, Pollock Sheehan Inc., Providence, R.I., was on brief, for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island.

Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE and CAMPBELL, Circuit Judges.


We are informed that the parties have reached agreement as to the meaning of the arbitrator's award and its resubmission to the arbitrator for resolution of ambiguities pursuant to the district court's order is no longer necessary or contemplated. Thus the arbitral process has apparently run its course. We dissolve the injunction and remand this case to the district court for further consideration in light of this development. See Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood Co., 299 U.S. 259, 267-268, 57 S.Ct. 202, 81 L.Ed. 178 (1936); Patterson v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 600, 607, 55 S.Ct. 575, 79 L.Ed. 1082 (1935).

We intimate no opinion as to the propriety of injunctive relief at a time when it had become clear by virtue of the award's remand for clarification that the arbitral process had not yet run its course. However, under the parties' collective bargaining agreement the union's implicit obligation not to strike was at least suspended by Narragansett's failure to abide by the arbitrator's award. It appears to us that in continuing to challenge the award after it had been confirmed by the district court, Narragansett brought into play the contractual language dealing with the situation where one party "fails to abide" by a decision. Hence we have difficulty in seeing how the strike in question could have contravened the union's no-strike obligation, and we suggest Narragansett address this question before the court on remand.

Vacated and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Narragansett Imp. Co. v. Local Union No. 251

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nov 29, 1974
506 F.2d 715 (1st Cir. 1974)
Case details for

Narragansett Imp. Co. v. Local Union No. 251

Case Details

Full title:NARRAGANSETT IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LOCAL UNION NO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit

Date published: Nov 29, 1974

Citations

506 F.2d 715 (1st Cir. 1974)

Citing Cases

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Costle

Duke Power has been uniformly interpreted as indicating the procedure to be followed by an appellate court…