From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nahm v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 2, 2000
760 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D99-3707.

June 2, 2000.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.140 (i) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Janette Dunnigan, Judge.


David Nahm appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied Nahm's pro se motion as successive based upon a prior postconviction motion filed on Nahm's behalf by his trial counsel. Nahm's current motion alleges numerous instances of ineffective assistance of that same trial counsel. Under these circus stances, Nahm's second motion is not procedurally barred. See Parker v. Dugger, 660 So.2d 1386 (Fla. 1995). We, therefore, reverse the trial court's order and remand for the trial court to consider the motion on its merits.

Reversed and Remanded.

Threadgill, A.C.J., and Blue and Green, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Nahm v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 2, 2000
760 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Nahm v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID NAHM, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 2, 2000

Citations

760 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. State

However, because the case law cited by Sanchez does not reflect a new statement of the law, we affirm the…