From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naclerio Contracting Co. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 12, 1987
69 N.Y.2d 794 (N.Y. 1987)

Opinion

Argued January 14, 1987

Decided February 12, 1987

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Harold Tompkins, J.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Barry P. Schwartz and Fay Leoussis of counsel), for appellants.

Joseph S. Kaming and Elizabeth C. Kaming for respondent.

George P. Felleman, Jonathan Sinnreich and Andrew R. Schein for County of Suffolk, amicus curiae.



Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 116 A.D.2d 463) and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Naclerio Contracting Co. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 12, 1987
69 N.Y.2d 794 (N.Y. 1987)
Case details for

Naclerio Contracting Co. v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:NACLERIO CONTRACTING CO., INC., Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 12, 1987

Citations

69 N.Y.2d 794 (N.Y. 1987)
513 N.Y.S.2d 115
505 N.E.2d 625

Citing Cases

Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co. v. City of New York

The motion was initially denied on the ground of prejudice to the plaintiff. Upon renewal, the motion court,…

Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

Auth., 66 N.Y.2d 341, 345, supra). Thus, "[i]t has long been the policy of the law to interfere as little as…