In South v. State, 111 Neb. 383, 196 N.W. 684 (1923), this court held that a defendant should be free from shackles during a criminal prosecution unless they are necessary to prevent violence or escape.
Summary of this case from State v. Heathman6 Div. 325.
December 18, 1923.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Wm. E. Fort, Judge.
Appeal dismissed.
In South v. State, 111 Neb. 383, 196 N.W. 684 (1923), this court held that a defendant should be free from shackles during a criminal prosecution unless they are necessary to prevent violence or escape.
Summary of this case from State v. HeathmanIn South v. State, 111 Neb. 383, 196 N.W. 684 (1923), the court concluded that the accused in a criminal prosecution should be free from shackles during his trial unless they are necessary to prevent violence or escape.
Summary of this case from State v. WeikleFull title:M. S. NABORS v. STATE
Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama
Date published: Dec 18, 1923
The court overruled his objections and indicated that the only reason for the restraints was because of the…
State v. HeathmanThere, we held the action of the trial court to be both reasonable and prudent to ensure the safety of all…