From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naas v. Peters

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Jan 24, 1944
321 Ill. App. 212 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)

Opinion

Gen. No. 42,785.

Opinion filed January 24, 1944. Rehearing denied February 8, 1944.

FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES, § 219deficiency liability of beneficiary of resulting trust. Where evidence showed that original grantee had no money, that property was purchased by his mother to whom he quitclaimed property on day of original transaction, that mother furnished all of money paid, and that original grantee took title and executed trust deed and notes for part of purchase money merely for mother, resulting trust was created, on conveyance to original grantee — mother being real owner of property, and she was liable for deficiency on trust deed's foreclosure.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal by defendant from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. JOSEPH A. GRABER, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1943. Decrees affirmed. Opinion filed January 24, 1944. Rehearing denied February 8, 1944.

MULCAHY, MURPHY DIERINGER, of Chicago, for appellant; MICHAEL F. MULCAHY, WILLIAM T. MURPHY and HENRY W. DIERINGER, all of Chicago, of counsel.

SAMUEL J. ANDALMAN, of Chicago, for appellee.


By this appeal defendant, Rose B. Peters, seeks to reverse a decree entered in a foreclosure suit holding her liable for the deficiency of $3,834.45.

The record discloses that plaintiff, Dorothy A. Naas, owned some vacant lots in Niles, Illinois, which on December 31, 1934, she conveyed to Lester B. Peters for $20,000, of which $6,000 was paid in cash, and on the same day, Lester B. Peters executed his notes for $14,000 for the balance of the purchase price, and conveyed the property by trust deed to secure the payment of the $14,000. Immediately following this and on the same day, Lester B. Peters conveyed the premises by quit claim deed to his mother, Rose B. Peters, the defendant. Afterward a number of payments were made on the indebtedness and June 30, 1941, default was made in payment and a suit filed to foreclose the lien of the trust deed for the amount remaining due and unpaid. The cause was referred to a master in chancery who took the evidence, made up his report, a decree of foreclosure was entered, the property afterward sold and Lester B. Peters and his mother, Rose B. Peters, were held liable for the deficiency. The mother alone prosecutes this appeal.

The evidence all shows that Lester, the son, had no money; that the property was purchased by his mother, title taken in his name, that she furnished all the money and that he took title and executed the trust deed and notes merely for his mother. In these circumstances when the title to the property was conveyed to Lester a resulting trust was created, the mother being the real owner of the property and she is liable for the deficiency. Bride v. Stormer, 368 Ill. 524.

The decrees of the superior court of Cook county are affirmed.

Decrees affirmed.

NIEMEYER and MATCHETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Naas v. Peters

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Jan 24, 1944
321 Ill. App. 212 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
Case details for

Naas v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:Dorothy A. Naas, Appellee, v. Rose B. Peters, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District

Date published: Jan 24, 1944

Citations

321 Ill. App. 212 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
52 N.E.2d 817

Citing Cases

New York Life Ins. v. 1325 Astor St. Bldg. Corp.

Counsel for plaintiff in their brief say that the individual defendants "were the purchasers of the property,…

Naas v. Peters

Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE FULTON delivered the opinion of the court: This suit arises out of an action in the…