From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N. Kruger, Inc. v. CNA Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 15, 1997
242 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 15, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, with costs, by (1) deleting the provision thereof which granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and substituting therefore a provision denying that motion, and (2) adding a provision thereto granting the plaintiffs and the defendant, Valley Forge Insurance Company, leave to renew their respective motion and cross motion upon the entry of judgment in the underlying action.

The language of the additional insured endorsement of the subject insurance policy is unambiguous. It provides that the plaintiff, N. Kruger, Inc. (hereinafter Kruger), the general contractor, is covered only for its vicarious liability for the work of the subcontractor, DME Contracting, Inc., performed for or on its behalf.

This is distinct from coverage for liability "arising out of" the work of the subcontractor for or on behalf of Kruger. Under the latter, broader construction there would be coverage for the additional insured even in the absence of a negligent act or omission of the subcontractor, so long as the claim against Kruger, stemmed from the fact that the subcontractor was performing its contracted-for services for the plaintiff. This would encompass a situation in which, for example, an employee of the subcontractor, in the course of employment and doing work for the plaintiff, Kruger, was injured as a result of Kruger's own negligence, or by another subcontractor at the scene ( see, Tishman Interiors Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 236 A.D.2d 385).

We conclude, however, that it is premature to grant summary judgment to either the plaintiffs or to the defendant Valley Forge Insurance Company. Until the facts are developed in the underlying action it cannot be concluded whether the injuries suffered by the injured employee resulted from the subcontractor's work, or solely from the acts or omissions of Kruger ( cf., Tishman Constr. Corp. v. CNA Ins. Co., 236 A.D.2d 211).

Ritter, J.P., Altman, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

N. Kruger, Inc. v. CNA Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 15, 1997
242 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

N. Kruger, Inc. v. CNA Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:N. KRUGER, INC., et al., Respondents, v. CNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 15, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 529

Citing Cases

Wilson Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co.

School District (hereinafter the District) alleges that the defendant Utica Mutual Insurance Company…

Yondt v. Boulevard Mall Co.

The claims for breach of contract are based upon the allegation that Mallare failed to maintain insurance…