From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lehman v. North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 2011
16 N.Y.3d 747 (N.Y. 2011)

Opinion

Argued January 5, 2011.

Decided February 10, 2011

APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered September 29, 2009. The Appellate Division (1) reversed, on the law, an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Francis A. Nicolai, J.), which had denied a motion by North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it, and (2) granted the motion.

Plaintiff commenced a personal injury action to recover damages for injuries she sustained when she allegedly slipped and fell on a patch of ice in a parking lot on property owned by defendant Horton School Associates. Defendant North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC provided snow removal services to defendant Horton pursuant to an oral agreement.

Lehman v North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC, 65 AD3d 1291, affirmed.

Law Office of Lori D. Fishman, Tarrytown ( George R. Dieter of counsel), for North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC, respondent.

Thomas D. Hughes, New York City, Richard C. Rubinstein and David D. Hess for Horton School Associates, respondent.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Defendant-respondent North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC, in contracting to render snow removal services to property owner Horton School Associates, did not assume a duty of care toward third parties who used the property ( see e.g. Eaves Brooks Costume Co. v Y.B.H. Realty Corp., 76 NY2d 220, 226; Moch Co. v Rensselaer Water Co., 247 NY 160, 167-168 [1928]). In the circumstances of this case, the Appellate Division correctly held that the property owner did not relinquish its duty to inspect and safely maintain the premises ( see Espinal v Melville Snow Contrs., 98 NY2d 136, 141).

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Lehman v. North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 2011
16 N.Y.3d 747 (N.Y. 2011)
Case details for

Lehman v. North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MYRA LEHMAN, Appellant, v. NORTH GREENWICH LANDSCAPING, LLC, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 10, 2011

Citations

16 N.Y.3d 747 (N.Y. 2011)
917 N.Y.S.2d 621
942 N.E.2d 1046

Citing Cases

Vazquez v. 1107 Fifth Ave. Corp.

A contractor does not assume a duty of care where the undertaking in the contract is limited and is “not a…

U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co. v. New Realty Realty Corp.

Here, there was no force or instrument of harm launched, no detrimental reliance, and no entire displacement…