From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. Sadlor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 22, 2005
16 A.D.3d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5664.

March 22, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nelson Roman, J.), entered on or about August 31, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, denied preclusion of medical evidence at trial due to spoliation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Friedman and Nardelli, JJ.


The original MRI of plaintiff's cervical spine shortly after the accident was inadvertently "corrupted" and destroyed by the medical imaging facility. Spoliation sanctions were denied because defendant failed to establish that the unavailability of the MRI film resulted from any intentional or willful act, or would impair his ability to defend against the claim of serious injury ( Herbert v. City of New York, 12 AD3d 209). Moreover, defendant has offered no plausible reason to regard the actual MRI film as "crucial" evidence when an abundance of other relevant medical evidence remains available to the parties for the period in question.


Summaries of

Myers v. Sadlor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 22, 2005
16 A.D.3d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Myers v. Sadlor

Case Details

Full title:DAWN A. MYERS, Respondent, v. HYMAN A. SADLOR, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 22, 2005

Citations

16 A.D.3d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
791 N.Y.S.2d 549

Citing Cases

Winston & Strawn, LLP v. Vulcan Capital Mgmt. Inc.

More importantly, Vulcan Capital's emails would have been created by, and originated with, Vulcan Capital,…

Abdur-Rahman v. Leytes

"[A] less severe sanction or no sanction is appropriate where the missing evidence does not deprive the…