From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mutual Film Co. v. Ohio Indus'l Comm

U.S.
Feb 23, 1915
236 U.S. 247 (1915)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

No. 457.

Argued January 6, 7, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915.

Decided on authority of Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Comm. of Ohio, ante, p. 230.

THE facts are stated in the opinion.

Argued simultaneously with No. 456 by the same counsel on the same briefs.


This case was submitted with No. 456, just decided. In the latter case the complainant in the court below and appellant here was a corporation of Virginia. The appellant in the pending case is a corporation of Ohio, and counsel say "although there are some differences in the way in which their business is conducted, yet the questions involved are the same, the records in both cases are nearly identical, and the court below treated them together, rendering the one opinion to cover both." And counsel have submitted them on the same argument.

On the authority, therefore, of the opinion in No. 456, the decree is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Mutual Film Co. v. Ohio Indus'l Comm

U.S.
Feb 23, 1915
236 U.S. 247 (1915)
Case details for

Mutual Film Co. v. Ohio Indus'l Comm

Case Details

Full title:MUTUAL FILM COMPANY v . INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 23, 1915

Citations

236 U.S. 247 (1915)

Citing Cases

Matter of Commercial Pictures v. Bd. of Regents

Our law, under which thousands of pictures have been licensed or denied licenses, is typical of the eight…

Pathe Exchange, Inc. v. Cobb

A similar statute in Ohio (Ohio Laws of 1913, chap. 161; 103 Ohio Laws, 399, H.B. No. 322; Ohio Gen. Code, §…