From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. New York Central Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Summary

In Murray v. New York Central R.R. Co. (229 App. Div. 749; affd., 256 N.Y. 623) the plaintiff testified that as he alighted from the train he stepped on an uneven and wobbly piece of curbing which caused him to fall.

Summary of this case from Jones v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Opinion

April, 1930.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law.


Summaries of

Murray v. New York Central Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

In Murray v. New York Central R.R. Co. (229 App. Div. 749; affd., 256 N.Y. 623) the plaintiff testified that as he alighted from the train he stepped on an uneven and wobbly piece of curbing which caused him to fall.

Summary of this case from Jones v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Case details for

Murray v. New York Central Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:WENDELL P. MURRAY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1930

Citations

229 App. Div. 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

In Stark v. Franklin Simon Co., Inc. ( 237 App. Div. 42) it appeared that the plaintiff tripped on a metal…