In Murray v. New York Central R.R. Co. (229 App. Div. 749; affd., 256 N.Y. 623) the plaintiff testified that as he alighted from the train he stepped on an uneven and wobbly piece of curbing which caused him to fall.
Summary of this case from Jones v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.April, 1930.
Present — Sears, P.J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law.
In Murray v. New York Central R.R. Co. (229 App. Div. 749; affd., 256 N.Y. 623) the plaintiff testified that as he alighted from the train he stepped on an uneven and wobbly piece of curbing which caused him to fall.
Summary of this case from Jones v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Full title:WENDELL P. MURRAY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Apr 1, 1930
In Stark v. Franklin Simon Co., Inc. ( 237 App. Div. 42) it appeared that the plaintiff tripped on a metal…