holding that a bankruptcy judge and trustee acting pursuant to court order are immune for deprivation of constitutional rights unless their acts are in clear absence of all jurisdiction
Summary of this case from In re Center Teleproductions, Inc.No. 87-6725.
June 6, 1988.
Appeal from C.A. 9th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied. Reported below: 828 F. 2d 1385.
holding that a bankruptcy judge and trustee acting pursuant to court order are immune for deprivation of constitutional rights unless their acts are in clear absence of all jurisdiction
Summary of this case from In re Center Teleproductions, Inc.recognizing that a court may take judicial notice of pleadings and orders on a motion to dismiss
Summary of this case from Steinmetz v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Full title:MULLIS v. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 6, 1988
The questions presented in this case are: (1) whether United States Supreme Court decisions rendered…
WR Grace Co v. StateWe are also asked to decide if the various taxpayers (taxpayers) in these cases have standing to request…