From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullins v. MacMahan

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Feb 24, 1981
536 F. Supp. 12 (E.D. Tenn. 1981)

Opinion

No. Civ-2-80-225.

February 13, 1981. Certificate February 24, 1981.

James Mullins, Jr., pro se.

Darryl G. Lowe, Knoxville, Tenn., and John F. Dugger, Morristown, Tenn., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


The plaintiff seeks herein to recover compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged deprivation by the defendants of his federally-protected civil rights. He attempts to assert claims arising under the federal civil rights statutes, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 1982, 1985 and, in all probability, 1983.

The complaint on its face, shows that the claims herein of the plaintiff are barred by the one-year period of limitation of T.C.A. § 28-3-104(a), formerly T.C.A. § 28-304. Schofield v. Gilland, D.C.Tenn. (1977), 78 F.R.D. 279, 280[3, 4]; Elmore v. Evans, D.C. Tenn. (1976), 449 F. Supp. 2, 3-4[2, 3], affirmed C.A. 6th (1978), 577 F.2d 740 (table); Brown v. Hipshire (Tenn., 1977), 553 S.W.2d 570, 571. Accordingly, upon motion of the defendants, this action hereby is DISMISSED for the failure of the plaintiff to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

"* * * [C]ivil actions for compensatory or punitive damages or both, brought under the federal civil rights statutes * * * shall be commenced within one (1) year after [the] cause of action accrued. * * *" T.C.A. § 28-3-104(a).

CERTIFICATE

The plaintiff Mr. James Mullins, Jr. was permitted to proceed herein in forma pauperis. Order of December 30, 1980 herein. This action was dismissed for his failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Judgment of February 13, 1981 herein.

Before the filing of any notice of appeal therefrom, the plaintiff filed a motion in this Court to be allowed to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, together with an affidavit showing in the detail prescribed by form 4 of the appendix of forms of the Rules of Appellate Procedure his inability to pay fees and costs or to give security therefor and his belief that he is entitled to redress. Rule 24(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It hereby is CERTIFIED by this Court that any such appeal would not be taken in good faith, for the reason that the complaint herein shows on its face that this civil action for compensatory and punitive damages, brought under the federal civil rights statutes, accrued in February, 1977 and was not commenced until December 30, 1980, and is barred under the applicable statute of limitation, i.e., T.C.A. § 28-3-104(a), because not commenced within 1 year after the cause of action accrued. Idem. Thus, the plaintiff failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The clerk of this Court shall serve forthwith notice of this action by this Court, idem., which does not preclude the plaintiff's filing a motion in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for leave so to proceed within 30 days after service of notice of such action of this Court, accompanied by a copy of this statement of the reasons given by this Court for its instant action. Idem.


Summaries of

Mullins v. MacMahan

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Feb 24, 1981
536 F. Supp. 12 (E.D. Tenn. 1981)
Case details for

Mullins v. MacMahan

Case Details

Full title:James MULLINS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Bob MACMAHAN, etc., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division

Date published: Feb 24, 1981

Citations

536 F. Supp. 12 (E.D. Tenn. 1981)

Citing Cases

Jenkins v. Carruth

They are correct. Harrison v. Wright, C.A.6th (1972), 457 F.2d 793; Mullins v. MacMahan, D.C.Tenn. (1981),…