From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muller v. Manhattan Railway Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1909
88 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1909)

Opinion

Argued March 25, 1909

Decided April 9, 1909

J. Osgood Nichols, Ralph Norton and Alfred A. Gardner for appellants.

W.G. Peckham for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Howell v. Leavitt ( 95 N.Y. 617); no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER and HISCOCK, JJ.


Summaries of

Muller v. Manhattan Railway Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1909
88 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1909)
Case details for

Muller v. Manhattan Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:CLEMENS MULLER, Respondent, v . MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 9, 1909

Citations

88 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1909)
195 N.Y. 539

Citing Cases

West Branch State Bank v. Farmers Union Exchange

We do not think that the court abused this discretion, under the circumstances. See Armstrong v. James Co.,…

Janssen v. Lumber Co.

We believe the remarks, though of course not intended to do so, had the effect of causing the minority to…