From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulholland v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 6, 1928
166 N.E. 202 (Ohio 1928)

Opinion

No. 20989

Decided June 6, 1928.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Hancock county.

Messrs. Dunn Dunn and Mr. Otto W. Hess, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. John E. Priddy, Mr. E.C. Turner, attorney general, and Mr. H.E. Werner, for defendant in error.


It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., KINKADE, JONES and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mulholland v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 6, 1928
166 N.E. 202 (Ohio 1928)
Case details for

Mulholland v. State

Case Details

Full title:MULHOLLAND v. THE STATE OF OHIO

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 6, 1928

Citations

166 N.E. 202 (Ohio 1928)
166 N.E. 202