From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muir v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1881
58 Cal. 361 (Cal. 1881)

Summary

In Muir v. Superior Court, 58 Cal. 361, in passing upon the same objection, the court say: "The defense of a former adjudication does not go to the jurisdiction of the court.

Summary of this case from White v. Superior Court

Opinion

         Department Two

         Application for writ of certiorari.

         COUNSEL

          C. Temple Emmett, for Plaintiff.

         A. H. Griffith, for Defendant.


         OPINION

         The Court:

         The defense of a former adjudication does not go to the jurisdiction of the Court. In this case, when the question whether the contempt charged had been before adjudicated was raised, the Court had the same power to pass upon it as it had to pass upon any other question in the case, and if it erred in holding that there was no such former adjudication as claimed, the error can not be reviewed upon certiorari. That writ lies only in cases where the inferior Court has exceeded its jurisdiction. ( Code Civ. Proc. § 1068.)

         Writ dismissed.


Summaries of

Muir v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1881
58 Cal. 361 (Cal. 1881)

In Muir v. Superior Court, 58 Cal. 361, in passing upon the same objection, the court say: "The defense of a former adjudication does not go to the jurisdiction of the court.

Summary of this case from White v. Superior Court
Case details for

Muir v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:L. MUIR v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1881

Citations

58 Cal. 361 (Cal. 1881)

Citing Cases

White v. Superior Court

The claim of once in jeopardy cannot be considered upon certiorari. (Muir v. Superior Court , 58 Cal. 361.)…

Times-Mirror Company, a Corporation v. Superior Court (W. R. Hervey)

The writ of certiorari can be called into use only for the purpose of reviewing judgments or orders made…