From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Lappin

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Sep 23, 2009
Civil Action No. 2:07cv18 (N.D.W. Va. Sep. 23, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:07cv18.

September 23, 2009


ORDER


It will be recalled that on October 24, 2008, Magistrate Judge Kaull filed his Report and Recommendation, wherein the Plaintiff was directed, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), to file with the Clerk of Court any written objections within ten (10) days after being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed his objections on November 10, 2008.

Upon examination of the report from the Magistrate Judge, it appears to the Court that the issues raised by the Plaintiff in his Complaint, brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), wherein Plaintiff alleges a violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment by a denial of medical care, were thoroughly considered by Magistrate Judge Kaull in his Report and Recommendation. Upon review of the Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds that the Plaintiff has not raised any issues that were not already throughly considered and addressed by the Magistrate Judge in his Report and Recommendation. Moreover, the Court, upon an independent de novo consideration of all matters now before it, is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation accurately reflects the law applicable to the facts and circumstances before the Court in this action. Therefore, it is

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Kaull's Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is, accepted in whole and that this civil action be disposed of in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Complaint shall be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (docket #18) shall be, and the same hereby is, STRICKEN from the record and the defendants added as a result of that document to TERMINATED from this case. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment for the Defendants. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled civil action shall be STRICKEN from the docket of this Court. It is further

ORDERED that, if Plaintiff should desire to appeal the decision of this Court, written notice of appeal must be received by the Clerk of this Court within thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the Judgment Order, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The $5.00 filing fee for the notice of appeal and the $450.00 docketing fee should also be submitted with the notice of appeal. In the alternative, at the time the notice of appeal is submitted, Plaintiff may, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, seek leave to proceedin forma pauperis from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to transmit a copy of this Order to all parties appearing herein.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Lappin

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Sep 23, 2009
Civil Action No. 2:07cv18 (N.D.W. Va. Sep. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Lappin

Case Details

Full title:ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN, HAROLD WATTS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Sep 23, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:07cv18 (N.D.W. Va. Sep. 23, 2009)

Citing Cases

Muhammad v. Laybourn

The Court directed Muhammad to identify each prior action that he filed from 1990 to the present challenging…

Muhammad v. Lappin

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Lappin, No.…