From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Incorporated

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sep 10, 1959
271 F.2d 591 (2d Cir. 1959)

Opinion

No. 25753.

Petition for Rehearing en Banc Filed September 10, 1959. Decided November 12, 1959.

Spar, Schlem Burroughs, New York City (Charles Spar and Leon B. Savetsky, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Reid Priest, New York City (Ralph M. McDermid, New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD, WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.


The petition to vacate our order of August 28, 1959, is denied by the court sitting en banc. Upon reconsideration we find that the application for leave to appeal was timely inasmuch as it was made to us within 10 days of the order of the district judge that contained the 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) statement. Because in our judgment the grant of leave to appeal will not fulfill the purpose expressed in the statute, we, in our discretion, adhere to our previous decision denying leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Incorporated

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sep 10, 1959
271 F.2d 591 (2d Cir. 1959)
Case details for

Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:Edward O. MUELLER, Plaintiff, v. RAYON CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED, and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Sep 10, 1959

Citations

271 F.2d 591 (2d Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

Walters v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

Cert. denied 359 U.S. 926, 79 S.Ct. 609, 3 L.Ed.2d 628 (1959). 8. Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Inc., 2 Cir.,…

United States v. Gori

But additionally the court reserves the right, as the statute, 28 U.S.C. § 46(c), provides, to proceed in…