From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M.T. v. Accounts Recovery Bureau, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Aug 28, 2012
CAUSE NO. 1:11-cv-969-WTL-DKL (S.D. Ind. Aug. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 1:11-cv-969-WTL-DKL

08-28-2012

M.T., by and through DENISE TODD, Plaintiff, v. ACCOUNTS RECOVERY BUREAU, INC., Defendant.


ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate Judge submitted her Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Motion for Assessment of Attorney's Fees and Costs. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court finds that the Plaintiff's costs, including a reasonable attorney fee, total $2,710.00.

Within 14 days of the date of this Entry, the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff the amount of $3,710.00. pursuant to its settlement offer. Within 21 days of the date of this Entry, the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice.

The Defendant purported to make an offer of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 in the amount of $1,000.00 plus costs, including reasonable attorney fees. Despite what the parties call it, it was not an offer of judgment because the parties have not agreed to have judgment entered; rather, they have agreed to dismiss this case, with prejudice, once the Defendant has paid the amount it owes the Plaintiff.

_____________

Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana
Copies to all counsel of record via electronic notification


Summaries of

M.T. v. Accounts Recovery Bureau, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Aug 28, 2012
CAUSE NO. 1:11-cv-969-WTL-DKL (S.D. Ind. Aug. 28, 2012)
Case details for

M.T. v. Accounts Recovery Bureau, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:M.T., by and through DENISE TODD, Plaintiff, v. ACCOUNTS RECOVERY BUREAU…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

CAUSE NO. 1:11-cv-969-WTL-DKL (S.D. Ind. Aug. 28, 2012)

Citing Cases

Peavler v. Law Firm of Krisor & Assocs.

isor argues that the following time entries are excessive: 0.2 hours of attorney time to draft the affidavit,…