From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mt. Hood Stages, Inc, v. Greyhound Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 7, 1978
583 F.2d 469 (9th Cir. 1978)

Opinion

No. 74-1282.

September 7, 1978.

William W Schwarzer (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

Michael N. Khourie (argued), of Broad, Khourie Schulz, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before BROWNING and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and LINDBERG, District Judge.

Honorable William J. Lindberg, Senior United States District Judge, Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.


Pursuant to mandate of the Supreme Court, Greyhound Corp. v. Mt. Hood Stages, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 98 S.Ct. 2370, 57 L.Ed.2d 239 (1978), this case has been remanded to us for resolution of appellee's contention that the Clayton Act's statute of limitations, 15 U.S.C. § 15b (1976 ed.), was tolled, under equitable principles.

We think it is appropriate to remand this case to the trial court to decide in the first instance whether the equitable tolling claim was raised at such a time and in such manner as to preserve that issue for decision by the trial court, and, if so, whether the statute of limitations was in fact equitably tolled. Cf. Poloron Products, Inc. v. Lybrand Ross Bros. Montgomery, 534 F.2d 1012, 1018 (2d Cir. 1976); United States v. Fahrenkamp, 312 F.2d 627, 632 (8th Cir. 1963); Nuelsen v. Sorensen, 293 F.2d 454, 462 (9th Cir. 1961).

Both issues turn in large part upon questions of fact. Remand for consideration by the trial judge, who is fully familiar with the facts, should not occasion undue delay. Any appeal can be expedited.

Remanded.


Summaries of

Mt. Hood Stages, Inc, v. Greyhound Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 7, 1978
583 F.2d 469 (9th Cir. 1978)
Case details for

Mt. Hood Stages, Inc, v. Greyhound Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MT. HOOD STAGES, INC., D/B/A PACIFIC TRAILWAYS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. THE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 7, 1978

Citations

583 F.2d 469 (9th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

Planned v. A.C.L.A

In an earlier appeal, we had remanded for consideration of whether the Clayton Act's statute of limitations…

Twin City Sportservice v. Charles O. Finley

Finley argues that since the damages awarded in the 1972 and 1979 judgments are identical, post-judgment…