From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mravlja v. Hoke

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1966
218 N.E.2d 314 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued May 3, 1966

Decided June 2, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, LAWRENCE H. COOKE, J.

Robert H. Ecker for John Mravlja, appellant in the first above-entitled action.

F. Van D. Ladd for John Mravlja, appellant in the second above-entitled action.

Edward J. Grogan for Richard Hoke, respondent in the first above-entitled action and appellant in the second above-entitled action.

Howard A. Levine and George W. Stroebel, Jr., for Gustave Christman, respondent.



In the first above-entitled action: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

In the second above-entitled action: Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.


Summaries of

Mravlja v. Hoke

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1966
218 N.E.2d 314 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

Mravlja v. Hoke

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MRAVLJA, Appellant, v. RICHARD HOKE, Respondent. GUSTAVE CHRISTMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1966

Citations

218 N.E.2d 314 (N.Y. 1966)
218 N.E.2d 314
271 N.Y.S.2d 271

Citing Cases

Starks v. Poulein

Obviously, counsel had ample opportunity to examine the applicable statutes under the facts of this case. It…

O'Hearn v. O'Hearn

The plaintiff objected to such questioning but the court allowed it and the defendant testified that the…