From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mountain Laurel Racing v. Fitzgerald

U.S.
May 19, 1980
446 U.S. 956 (1980)

Summary

finding a sufficiently close nexus between the State and a racing company's actions

Summary of this case from Bier v. Fleming

Opinion

No. 79-1105.

May 19, 1980, October TERM, 1979.


C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN would grant certiorari. Reported below: 607 F. 2d 589.


Summaries of

Mountain Laurel Racing v. Fitzgerald

U.S.
May 19, 1980
446 U.S. 956 (1980)

finding a sufficiently close nexus between the State and a racing company's actions

Summary of this case from Bier v. Fleming

stating that Federal Rule 706 is usually invoked before trial since there must be time for a hearing on an order to show cause, consent by the expert, notifying the expert of his duties, and findings to be communicated to the parties

Summary of this case from Swilling v. Swilling
Case details for

Mountain Laurel Racing v. Fitzgerald

Case Details

Full title:MOUNTAIN LAUREL RACING, INC., ET AL. v. FITZGERALD

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 19, 1980

Citations

446 U.S. 956 (1980)

Citing Cases

Cruz v. Hendy Intern. Co.

Christofferson v. Halliburton Co., 534 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir. 1976) (injured seaman's wife may not recover for…

United States v. Gray

Appellants contend that the search of the living quarters violated the crew's fourth amendment rights, and…