From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Motyka v. Detroit, G. H. M. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 31, 1932
260 Mich. 396 (Mich. 1932)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 3, 4, 5, Calendar Nos. 35,082, 35,083, 35,084.

Submitted September 28, 1932. January, 1931.

Order directing entry of judgments for plaintiffs, and interest to run from such entry October 31, 1932.

Separate tort actions by Thomas Motyka, administrator of the estate of John Motyka, deceased, Mary Miecznik, administratrix of the estate of Casimir Krzewinski, deceased, and Maryanna Kulesza, administratrix of the estate of Stanislaw Kulesza, deceased, against the Detroit, Grand Haven Milwaukee Railway Company and another. Judgments ordered entered on the verdicts for plaintiffs. (See 253 Mich. 647, 256 Mich. 417.) On motion to reconsider order for interest on verdicts. Submitted September 28, 1932. (January, 1931, Docket Nos. 3, 4, 5, Calendar Nos. 35,082, 35,083, 35,084.) Order directing entry of judgments for plaintiffs, and interest to run from such entry October 31, 1932.

Arthur A. Koscinski and Robert J. Wojcinski, for plaintiffs.

Frederic T. Harward, Frederick V. Slocum, H.V. Spike, and Wm. W. Macpherson, for defendants.


In tort actions plaintiffs, upon trial by jury, had verdicts, but the court entered judgments non obstante veredicto for defendants. Upon review we reversed the judgments ( Motyka v. Railway Co., 253 Mich. 647, 256 Mich. 417) and ordered judgments in the circuit court to be entered on the verdicts.

Reconsideration of the allowance of interest upon the verdicts is moved.

"At common law interest was as a rule not allowed on judgments." 15 R. C. L. p. 15.

Interest upon verdicts and judgments is purely statutory, and, being in derogation of the common law, cannot be extended beyond stated statutory regulation. Straus v. Elless Co., 245 Mich. 558. The statute, 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 14555, awards interest upon judgments in tort actions "from the time of entry of the same." In actions founded on contracts, in certain specified instances, interest upon verdicts may be included in judgments. 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9238.

Entry of judgment means the ministerial act of the clerk in recording it in the permanent records of the court.

The circuit court is now directed to enter judgments on the verdicts, and, from the time of such entry, the interest will commence to run and not before.

No costs.

CLARK, C.J., and McDONALD, POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, FEAD, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Motyka v. Detroit, G. H. M. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 31, 1932
260 Mich. 396 (Mich. 1932)
Case details for

Motyka v. Detroit, G. H. M. Ry. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MOTYKA v. DETROIT, GRAND HAVEN MILWAUKEE RAILWAY CO. MIECZNIK v. SAME…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Oct 31, 1932

Citations

260 Mich. 396 (Mich. 1932)
244 N.W. 897

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

The former is computed and added to the general verdict by the Court. Motyka v Detroit, G H M R Co, 260 Mich.…

Swift v. Dodson

This is purely statutory. See Motyka v. Detroit, Grand Haven Milwaukee R. Co. (1932). 260 Mich. 396, wherein…