From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Motor Vehicle Cas. Co. v. Thorpe Insulation Co. (In re Thorpe Insulation Co.)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 24, 2012
671 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2012)

Summary

holding that anti-assignment provisions barring transfer to a trust are impliedly preempted because they are an “obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress” in enacting § 524(g)

Summary of this case from In re Federal–Mogul Global Inc.

Opinion

Nos. 10–56543 10–56622.

2012-01-24

In the Matter of THORPE INSULATION COMPANY, Debtor,Motor Vehicle Casualty Company; Central National Insurance Company of Omaha; Century Indemnity Company, successor to Cigna Specialty Insurance Company, fka California Union Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Thorpe Insulation Company; Pacific Insulation Company, Appellees,National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, as successor by merger to Transcontinental Insurance Company; Continental Insurance Company, as successor in interest to certain policies issued by Harbor Insurance Company; Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, of Thorpe Insulation Company and Pacific Insulation Company; Charles B. Renfrew, Real Parties in Interest.In the Matter of Thorpe Insulation Company, Debtor,National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, as successor by merger to Transcontinental Insurance Company; Continental Insurance Company, as successor in interest to certain policies issued by Harbor Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Thorpe Insulation Company; Pacific Insulation Company, Appellees,Central National Insurance Company of Omaha; Motor Vehicle Casualty Company; Century Indemnity Company, successor to Cigna Specialty Insurance Company, fka California Union Insurance Company; Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, of Thorpe Insulation Company and Pacific Insulation Company; Charles B. Renfrew, Administrative Law Judge, Real Parties in Interest.


Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, in In re Thorpe Insulation Co., published in the advance sheet at this citation, 671 F.3d 980, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it was amended on denial of rehearing en banc. For substituted opinion, see 2012 WL 1089503.


Summaries of

Motor Vehicle Cas. Co. v. Thorpe Insulation Co. (In re Thorpe Insulation Co.)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 24, 2012
671 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2012)

holding that anti-assignment provisions barring transfer to a trust are impliedly preempted because they are an “obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress” in enacting § 524(g)

Summary of this case from In re Federal–Mogul Global Inc.

holding that insurers have bankruptcy standing “to participate in the proceedings culminating in approval of § 524(g) plan”

Summary of this case from In re Federal–Mogul Global Inc.

holding that § 541(c) itself preempts anti-assignment provisions that bar transfer to a 524(g) trust

Summary of this case from In re Federal–Mogul Global Inc.
Case details for

Motor Vehicle Cas. Co. v. Thorpe Insulation Co. (In re Thorpe Insulation Co.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of: THORPE INSULATION COMPANY, Debtor, MOTOR VEHICLE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

671 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2012)
55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 278
12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 939
2012 Daily Journal D.A.R. 968

Citing Cases

In re Federal–Mogul Global Inc.

Furthermore, in a recent en banc holding, we held that “the discussion of anti-assignment provisions in…

Sitanggang v. McIntyre (In re Sitanggang)

As an appellate court, our jurisdiction is limited to actual cases and controversies. Motor Vehicle Cas. Co.…