From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Motley v. Parks

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 21, 2005
401 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

No. 02-56648.

March 21, 2005.

D.C. No. CV-00-01472-MMM.

Stephen Yagman, Esq., Yagman Yagman, Venice, CA, Kathryn S. Bloomfield, Esq., Stephen Yagman, Esq., Yagman Yagman Reichmann, Venice Beach, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Kathryn S. Bloomfield, Esq., Janet G. Bogigian, Deputy City Attorney, Christian R. Bojorquez, Elizabeth A. Keech, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General (LA), David Pinchas, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Fisher is recused.


Summaries of

Motley v. Parks

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 21, 2005
401 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

Motley v. Parks

Case Details

Full title:Darla MOTLEY; Juan Jamerson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bernard PARKS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 21, 2005

Citations

401 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

Smith v. City of Oakland

First, the Ninth Circuit subsequently reheard the case en banc, and thus the panel opinion cannot be cited as…