Summary
explaining that an appellate court is empowered to disregard an assignment of error presented for review due to a lack of briefing by the party presenting that error
Summary of this case from Young v. Spring ValleyOpinion
1998.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Motion Docket
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1998
82 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 1998)
Summaries of
Motion Docket
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1998
82 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 1998)
explaining that an appellate court is empowered to disregard an assignment of error presented for review due to a lack of briefing by the party presenting that error
Summary of this case from Young v. Spring Valleyexplaining that an appellate court is empowered to disregard an assignment of error presented for review due to a lack of briefing by the party presenting that error
Summary of this case from In re MilellaCase details for
Motion Docket
Case Details
Full title:MOTION DOCKET
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Citations
82 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 1998)
694 N.E.2d 76
Citing Cases
Henry v. Gastaldo
{¶ 16} An appellate court may rely upon App.R. 12(A) in overruling or disregarding an assignment of error…
Cleveland v. Cuyahoga Lorain Corp.{¶ 6} An appellate court is empowered to disregard an assignment of error presented for review due to lack of…