From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mostafa v. Aurelia Osborne Fox Memorial Hosp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 29, 1990
159 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 29, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Otsego County (Mugglin, J.).


Plaintiff commenced this action to, inter alia, enjoin defendant from taking any action to prevent him from practicing anesthesiology at the hospital. Plaintiff alleged that defendant unlawfully suspended him by way of an internal hospital memorandum, stating that "[u]ntil further notice" plaintiff would not practice at defendant. Supreme Court ordered that the purported suspension of plaintiff's privileges be vacated and that his privileges be restored. Defendant now appeals. We reverse.

Since plaintiff alleged that his privileges were suspended pursuant to an internal memorandum "without [defendant] stating the reasons therefor" (Public Health Law § 2801-b), plaintiff is obligated to initially present his claim to the Public Health Council pursuant to Public Health Law § 2801-b (see, Guibor v Manhattan Eye, Ear Throat Hosp., 46 N.Y.2d 736, 737-738; Jackaway v Northern Dutchess Hosp., 139 A.D.2d 496, 497). Therefore, the relief sought by plaintiff through his motion for a preliminary injunction should have been denied.

Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion denied. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mostafa v. Aurelia Osborne Fox Memorial Hosp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 29, 1990
159 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Mostafa v. Aurelia Osborne Fox Memorial Hosp

Case Details

Full title:SAMIR MOSTAFA, Respondent, v. AURELIA OSBORNE FOX MEMORIAL HOSPITAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
553 N.Y.S.2d 536

Citing Cases

Mostafa v. Aurelia Osborne Fox Mem. Hosp

Decided September 11, 1990 Appeal from (3d Dept: 159 A.D.2d 922) FINALITY OF JUDGMENTS AND…

Gelbard v. Genesee Hosp

Thus, a court must dismiss any suit brought by a physician seeking reinstatement of his privileges if the…