From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mortgage Guar. Co. v. Kolkey

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Feb 1, 1939
30 Cal.App.2d 629 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)

Opinion

Docket No. 12063.

February 1, 1939.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County releasing and discharging a writ of execution. Robert W. Kenny, Judge. Appeal dismissed on motion.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Thomas M. Parrington for Appellant.

Abe Richman for Respondents.


This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the superior court releasing and discharging a writ of execution levied upon certain funds in the hands of a life insurance company. The matter comes before us on the motion of the defendant to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the subject-matter of the appeal has become moot.

[1] In support of the motion is filed an affidavit which states that the writ of execution was levied against moneys in the possession of the New York Life Insurance Company arising by reason of the existence of three policies of life insurance; that subsequent to the granting of said order releasing and discharging said moneys from the effect of said writ of execution, all of said moneys were released to the defendant; that no writ of supersedeas or stay of execution of any kind was obtained by plaintiff upon taking the appeal; and that on December 6, 1938, for a valuable consideration the defendant surrendered each and all of said policies of life insurance to said insurance company and said policies were cancelled. The motion is not contested and is granted.

Appeal dismissed.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Mortgage Guar. Co. v. Kolkey

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Feb 1, 1939
30 Cal.App.2d 629 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
Case details for

Mortgage Guar. Co. v. Kolkey

Case Details

Full title:MORTGAGE GUARANTEE COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. NATHAN KOLKEY et…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 1, 1939

Citations

30 Cal.App.2d 629 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
86 P.2d 1073

Citing Cases

Riverside Rancho Corp. v. Cowan

It is clear from this provision of the stipulation that the parties intended to maintain the status quo even…

NOMM v. NOMM

The question might still have some vitality had an appeal been taken from the interlocutory decree, but no…