affirming the dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's complaint under Rule 41(b) where the plaintiff failed to comply with discovery requests and the court's orders, including an order to show cause
Summary of this case from Echols v. Wingate Mgmt., Inc.No. 86-6126.
September 9, 1987.
Appeal from the E.D.Tenn., 660 F.Supp. 429.
AFFIRMED.
affirming the dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's complaint under Rule 41(b) where the plaintiff failed to comply with discovery requests and the court's orders, including an order to show cause
Summary of this case from Echols v. Wingate Mgmt., Inc.Full title:Morristown Block and Concrete Products Co. v. General Shale Products Corp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Sep 9, 1987
Neither the MTA nor the Modified MTA specifically states whether the above was to occur. We, therefore, must…
Strong v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueFederal law, however, determines the tax consequences which attend these defined rights. Sampson v.…