From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrissey v. Torino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06847

Argued April 15, 2003.

May 19, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Ponterio, J.), dated May 10, 2002, which granted the motion of the defendant Marilyn M. Torino for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Friedman James, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Andrew V. Buchsbaum of counsel), for appellants.

Charles V. Borsetti, Garden City, N.Y. (David B. Ownes of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The injured plaintiff, Carmella Morrissey, allegedly slipped and fell on the walkway of property owned by the defendant Marilyn M. Torino. The injured plaintiff stated in a deposition that prior to her fall she observed "little balls" that had fallen from a tree and were scattered about the walkway.

In support of her motion for summary judgment, Torino established her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that she neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the objects which had dropped off the tree on which the injured plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell (see Pressley v. New York City Hous. Auth., 238 A.D.2d 191; Capone v. Schaible, 211 A.D.2d 661). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the "little balls" were apparent for a sufficient length of time such that, in the exercise of reasonable care, Torino should have cleared them from the walkway (see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837-838; Henry v. Long Is. Sav. Bank, 277 A.D.2d 351, 352; Capone v. Schaible, supra).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, KRAUSMAN and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Morrissey v. Torino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Morrissey v. Torino

Case Details

Full title:CARMELLA MORRISSEY, ET AL., appellants, v. MARILYN M. TORINO, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 381

Citing Cases

Kollie v. Canales

As such, the Court cannot consider such evidence in determining the movant's entitlement to summary judgment…