Opinion
16-95-06606; CA A93853
Argued and submitted November 25, 1997
Affirmed February 4, 1998
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County.
Jack Billings, Judge.
Harold D. Gillis argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Gleaves Swearingen Larsen Potter Scott Smith.
James E. Mountain, Jr., argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Judith Giers and Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, Linder, Judge, and Rossman, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed.
Plaintiffs, sellers of real property, appeal from a judgment that, inter alia, allowed strict foreclosure and specified that defendants' total remaining "payoff" obligation on the land sale contract was $51,395.14. Plaintiffs assert that the $51,395.14 figure was erroneous in that it did not include accrued prejudgment interest from the date of default. Plaintiffs also appeal from a supplemental judgment for attorney fees, asserting that the court improperly offset and reduced their fees. We affirm.
Based on our review of the record, we conclude that any "error" in the $51,395.14 figure was invited error. In particular, plaintiffs' counsel proposed that figure to the trial court without qualification or reservation. Consequently, plaintiffs cannot complain of any "error" in that regard. See Calif.-Pacific Utilities v. Barry, 254 Or. 344, 347, 460 P.2d 847 (1969).
We reject, without elaboration, plaintiffs' arguments pertaining to the attorney fee award.
Affirmed.