From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. Union Natl. Bank of Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 17, 1977
371 A.2d 1310 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1977)

Summary

In Morrison v. Union National Bank of Pittsburgh, 244 Pa. Super. 634, 371 A.2d 1310 (1977), this court rendered a per curiam affirmance of a lower court order quashing an appeal from an arbitration award due to nonconformance with the local rule here in question.

Summary of this case from Mikita v. Bailey Homes, Inc.

Opinion

Argued November 12, 1976.

January 17, 1977.

Proceedings on appeal by plaintiff from award of arbitrators. Order entered quashing appeal, order by DOYLE, J. Plaintiff appealed. Appeal, No. 804, April T., 1976, from Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division of Allegheny County, No. 8657 of 1975. Argued November 12, 1976.

Michael L. Murphy, with him Robert T. Kane, for appellant; Samuel W. Braver, with him M. Bruce McCullough, for appellee.


Order affirmed.

WATKINS, P.J., absent.


Summaries of

Morrison v. Union Natl. Bank of Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 17, 1977
371 A.2d 1310 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1977)

In Morrison v. Union National Bank of Pittsburgh, 244 Pa. Super. 634, 371 A.2d 1310 (1977), this court rendered a per curiam affirmance of a lower court order quashing an appeal from an arbitration award due to nonconformance with the local rule here in question.

Summary of this case from Mikita v. Bailey Homes, Inc.
Case details for

Morrison v. Union Natl. Bank of Pittsburgh

Case Details

Full title:Morrison, Appellant, v. Union National Bank of Pittsburgh

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 17, 1977

Citations

371 A.2d 1310 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1977)
244 Pa. Super. 634

Citing Cases

Mikita v. Bailey Homes, Inc.

Appellants now contend that Rule 306(A)(1) is invalid because it contravenes the legislative requirements…