From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. Regus

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 10, 1927
22 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1927)

Opinion

No. 5025.

December 10, 1927.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Louis H. Burns, Judge.

Proceeding by the Walnut Creek Milling Company and another against the Grain Products Company, Cash J. Morrison and Carl L. Morrison, bankrupts. From a decree ( 21 F.[2d] 380) affirming an order of the referee directing the Morrisons to turn over to Henry Regus, as trustee in bankruptcy, a stated sum of money, they appeal. Affirmed.

L.L. Dubourg, of New Orleans, La. (Dart Dart and Leo. L. Dubourg, all of New Orleans, La., on the brief), for appellants.

A.P. Frymire, Harry McCall, and Morris B. Redmann, all of New Orleans, La., for appellees.

Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.



This is an appeal from a decree affirming an order of the referee directing bankrupts, the appellants, to turn over to the trustee a stated sum of money.

It is suggested in this court for the first time that the regular referee in bankruptcy who acted in the case was not authorized to do so, because no order referring the case to him was made. When the trial judge acted in the matter, he had before him the evidence taken before the referee, and no objection was made to that evidence on the ground that it was adduced before a referee who had no authority in the premises. If the objection had been made in the lower court, it could have been remedied by an order referring the case to the referee who had acted in the matter without objection.

The question whether the evidence on which the court itself acted in rendering the decree appealed from was subject to objection on the ground now suggested will not be considered by this court, because it was not raised in the court below, which had jurisdiction to render that decree. 2 R.C.L. 69. The record does not contain the evidence on which the court acted. This being so, it is to be presumed that the evidence warranted the decree appealed from.

The decree is affirmed.


Summaries of

Morrison v. Regus

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 10, 1927
22 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1927)
Case details for

Morrison v. Regus

Case Details

Full title:MORRISON et al. v. REGUS et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 1927

Citations

22 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1927)

Citing Cases

United States v. Abrams

It is not denied that the Government during this period had adequate sources of credit through which it could…

In re McMordie

Where one is unable or unwilling to explain what he has done with property which he is ordered to turn over,…