From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Wm. J. Duggan Co.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Nov 3, 1942
3 F.R.D. 39 (D. Mass. 1942)

Opinion

         Action by J. F. Morris against William J. Duggan Company. On plaintiff's motion for modification of an order.

         Order in accordance with opinion.

          Bernard Ginsburg, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

          Irving Lewis, of Boston, Mass., for defendant.


          FORD, District Judge.

         It appearing that Cornelius D. Duggan has already answered interrogatories proposed to him by the plaintiff, the motion, insofar as it relates to this subject, is denied. I see no reason for compelling any further answers.

          In the plaintiff's motion to admit facts and documents, he designates no time within which the admissions should be made as required by Rule 36, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. If he amends his request in this regard and designates the time within which the admissions are requested, the defendant-if, of course, he cares to do so-will either deny, under oath, specifically the matters of which the admissions are requested or set forth in detail the reasons why he cannot truthfully admit or deny those matters. Rule 36, F.R.C.P.


Summaries of

Morris v. Wm. J. Duggan Co.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Nov 3, 1942
3 F.R.D. 39 (D. Mass. 1942)
Case details for

Morris v. Wm. J. Duggan Co.

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS v. WM. J. DUGGAN CO.

Court:United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

Date published: Nov 3, 1942

Citations

3 F.R.D. 39 (D. Mass. 1942)

Citing Cases

Apodaca v. Gordon

The authorities are divided. Compare Hunter v. International Systems Controls Corp., 56 F.R.D. 617 (W.D.Mo.…