From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 5, 1978
249 S.E.2d 668 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

56574.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 13, 1978.

DECIDED OCTOBER 5, 1978. REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 18, 1978.

Rape, etc. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Blackshear.

E. B. Shaw, for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Victor Alexander, Jr., Robert M. Whaley, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.


We affirm the appellant's conviction for rape, aggravated sodomy, kidnapping and motor vehicle theft.

1. "Any enumerated error which is not supported in the brief by citation of authority or argument shall be deemed to have been abandoned." Rule 18(c) (2) of Court of Appeals (Code Ann. § 24-3618(c) (2)); Warren v. State, 145 Ga. App. 565 ( 244 S.E.2d 103) (1978). We accordingly deem all but the eighth enumeration to have been abandoned.

2. The eighth enumeration contends that nine photographs introduced by the state were admitted into evidence without proper foundation. Contrary to the appellant's contention, the photographer's testimony was not required. Atlanta, B. c. R. Co. v. Patterson, 75 Ga. App. 189 (3) ( 43 S.E.2d 177) (1947). Since the victim identified the photographs as portrayals of locations where she went before, during, and after she was attacked, the photographs were properly admitted.

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 13, 1978 — DECIDED OCTOBER 5, 1978 — REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 18, 1978 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 5, 1978
249 S.E.2d 668 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Morris v. State

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 5, 1978

Citations

249 S.E.2d 668 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
147 Ga. App. 595

Citing Cases

Wilkie v. State

1. Enumerations of Error 1, 3, 5, and 6 are abandoned by appellant, for failure to support by argument or…

Turner v. State

"Contrary to the appellant's contention, the photographer's testimony was not required. [Cit.]" Morris v.…