From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 11, 1922
92 So. 910 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)

Opinion

8 Div. 933.

April 11, 1922.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; W.W. Haralson, Judge.

Tom Morris was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appealed. Reversed and remanded.

John A. Lusk Son, of Guntersville, for appellant.

The evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction and the court should have directed a verdict for the defendant. Ante, p. 217, 90 So. 16; ante, p. 116, 90 south. 135; 89 So. 306; 17 Ala. App. 493, 85 So. 867.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


The defendant was convicted under an indictment which charged him with manufacturing prohibited liquors since January 25, 1919. There is no direct testimony in this case, nor circumstances, from which the inference could be drawn that the defendant manufactured liquor subsequent to January 25, 1919, and on this account the affirmative charge, as requested by the defendant, should have been given. Wadsworth v. State, ante, p. 352, 92 So. 245.

On this account the judgment of the circuit court must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 11, 1922
92 So. 910 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)
Case details for

Morris v. State

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 11, 1922

Citations

92 So. 910 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)
18 Ala. App. 435

Citing Cases

Gay v. State

Defendant was due the general affirmative charge. Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401, 85 So. 835; Morris v.…

Whetstone v. State

T.E. Martin, of Montgomery, for appellant. The affirmative charge, requested by defendant, should have been…