Opinion
Case No. SC05-2372.
June 8, 2006.
Lower Tribunal No. 3D05-2149.
As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to compel the Third District Court of Appeal to take any action regarding his appeal in that court (case number 3D05-2149), the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).
WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE and CANTERO, JJ., concur.