Summary
holding that the plaintiff's retaliation claim fails because plaintiff's statements could not be construed as protected activity because they contain threats
Summary of this case from Thompson v. City of CharlotteOpinion
1:02CV01005
February 11, 2004
ORDER and JUDGMENT
On December 24, 2003, the United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to this court's Standing Order 30, filed his Recommendation on the motion for summary judgment filed by the Defendant. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation, and Defendant filed a response to the objections The court has reviewed de novo the objections filed by the Plaintiff, and finds that they do not affect the ultimate disposition of this case recommended by the Magistrate Judge. The court will therefore adopt the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. #14] is GRANTED on all of Plaintiff's claims, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.