From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morganteen v. Cowboy Adventures, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One
Aug 28, 1997
190 Ariz. 463 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997)

Summary

holding that factual issues concerning the scope of the release precluded summary judgment for defendant

Summary of this case from Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc.

Opinion

No. 1 CA-CV 96-0243

Opinion Filed August 28, 1997

Appeal from the Superior Court of Maricopa County. Cause No. CV 94-11036.

The Honorable Steven D. Sheldon, Judge. Reversed and Remanded.

Dalton Gotto Samson Kilgard by Mark D. Samson and Ron Kilgard, Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants, Phoenix.

Tiffany Bosco, P.A. by Robert A. Royal and R.M. Joe Bushong, Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee, Phoenix.


Cowboy Adventures, Inc., a riding stable, requires trail ride customers to sign a document entitled "release and waiver of liability, assumption of risk, and indemnity agreement." James and Geraldine Morganteen, who signed the document, bring this negligence suit for injuries that Geraldine Morganteen sustained when she was bucked off a horse on a Cowboy Adventures ride. The trial court granted summary judgment for Cowboy Adventures, holding that the Morganteens waived the right to bring this suit. For reasons that follow, we reverse.

I.

In order to participate in a Cowboy Adventures trail ride, the Morganteens signed a preprinted exculpatory covenant releasing Cowboy Adventures in advance from liability for any injuries arising during the ride. The covenant, which we append, set forth certain risks of horseback riding; obliged a signer to "abide by and follow any instructions given . . . by the Stable or any of its employees, guides or wranglers"; and released the Stable, its owners, officers, agents, and employees, from any claim of liability, including any claim that they were "negligent in connection with [the signer's] riding experience or ability including but not limited to . . . instruction on riding skills or leading and supervising riders."

During the trail ride, Mrs. Morganteen's horse began to skitter, Mrs. Morganteen called for help, and a wrangler shouted back instructions. The wrangler says he shouted, "Don't pull on the reins," which would have been good advice. Mrs. Morganteen says he shouted, "Pull on the reins," which Cowboy Adventures concedes would have been bad advice. In reviewing summary judgment, we must assume that the facts favor appellants, and therefore assume that Mrs. Morganteen's version is true. Mrs. Morganteen did pull on the reins, the horse bucked her off, she broke her arm, and the Morganteens filed this suit.

Granting summary judgment for Cowboy Adventures, the trial court explained in part,

Giving a fair reading to all of the terms of the release agreement, the Court must conclude that the stable has done all that could reasonably be expected of it to convey to the potential customer that there are both inherent dangers in riding a horse and that the stable did not intend to be responsible for damages which occur as a result of the customer's voluntary decision to engage in this activity. Under the circumstances, the Court must conclude that the release condition, as a matter of law, serves to bar the plaintiff's action against the stable.

II.

Although the trial court couched its minute entry in terms of "inherent dangers in riding a horse," the Morganteens do not attribute Mrs. Morganteen's injury to such a danger, but rather to a negligent instruction by the wrangler. Negligent trail guidance is not an inherent risk of a trail ride. We accept for the purpose of appeal that it was negligent to instruct Mrs. Morganteen, in the circumstances that confronted her, to pull on the reins. The question is whether the covenant effectively exculpated Cowboy Adventures from responsibility for the negligence of its wrangler.

We found a prospective exculpatory covenant unenforceable in Sirek v. Fairfield Snowbowl, Inc., 166 Ariz. 183, 800 P.2d 1291 (App. 1990), because the covenant did not expressly relieve the defendant of liability for its negligence or that of its employees. The plaintiff there was injured when the bindings on her rental skis failed to release. The trial court found her lawsuit against the ski rental shop barred by an exculpatory covenant in the rental agreement. We reversed. Reasoning that prospective exculpatory covenants, if enforceable, are strictly construed against the enforcing party, we found that the Snowbowl covenant failed to clearly convey Snowbowl's intent to absolve itself from its own negligence. Id. at 187, 800 P.2d at 1295.

In Maurer v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc., 181 Ariz. 294, 890 P.2d 69 (App. 1994), as in this case, the defendant did attempt expressly to absolve itself from its own negligence. The defendant, a travel agency, sold and managed student package tours. A covenant in the agency's standard contract absolved it from liability for death, personal injury, or property damage sustained on a tour "whether due to [the agency's] own negligence or otherwise." Id. at 298, 890 P.2d at 73. A student on a tour fell to her death from a moving train. Her parents sued the travel agency for negligent failure to disclose that three students had similarly died on prior tours. The trial court denied the agency's motion for summary judgment, finding the covenant, despite its negligence provision, "too general" to be enforced. Id. The trial court found that the covenant failed "to alert Plaintiffs' decedent to the specific risks that she was supposedly waiving." Id. Division Two of this court approved the trial court's reasoning and affirmed. Id.

The Sirek and Maurer courts supported their decisions by reference to Salt River Project Agric. Improv. Power Dist. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. ("SRP"), 143 Ariz. 368, 694 P.2d 198 (1984). See Sirek, 166 Ariz. at 187, 800 P.2d at 1295; Maurer, 181 Ariz. at 298, 890 P.2d at 73. As SRP is the only case to date in which our supreme court has examined prospective exculpatory covenants, we turn our attention there as well.

The SRP case arose from SRP's negotiated purchase from Westinghouse of a $15,000 device to be used in the operation of a Westinghouse gas turbine generator. See SRP, 143 Ariz. at 372, 694 P.2d at 202. The device was flawed in design and failed, causing over $1.9 million in damages to SRP's generator. When SRP sued, Westinghouse responded by invoking a "LIMITATION OF LIABILITY" clause in the parties' contract that limited Westinghouse's liability to "the price of the product or part [$15,000] on which such liability is based." Id. at 373, 694 P.2d at 203.

The supreme court addressed the validity of this clause in a section of its opinion headed, "CAN LIABILITY IN TORT BE BARGAINED AWAY?" Id. at 382-85, 694 P.2d at 212-15. The court answered that question with a qualified yes. The court stated, "The law disfavors contractual provisions by which one party seeks to immunize himself against the consequences of his own torts." Id. at 383, 694 P.2d at 213. But the court described "sound reasons" in "a commercial setting" for an exception to the law's disfavor:

This exception to the ancient principle that a party may not immunize himself from the consequences of his own negligence is predicated upon the consideration that businessmen can bargain over which party is to bear the risk of damage and set the price accordingly, thus achieving a more rational distribution of the risk than the law would otherwise allow.

Id. (quoting Jig the Third Corp. v. Puritan Marine Ins. Underwriters Corp., 519 F.2d 171, 176 (5th Cir. 1975)).

The SRP court placed three conditions upon the enforcement of a prospective exculpatory covenant: (1) that there "is no public policy impediment to the limitation"; (2) "that the parties did, in fact, bargain for the limitation"; and (3) that the limiting language be strictly construed against the party seeking to enforce it. Id. The court placed particular emphasis on the second factor in discussing the law of waiver, which requires "an intentional relinquishment of a known right." Id. at 385, 694 P.2d at 215 (quoting City of Tucson v. Koerber, 82 Ariz. 347, 313 P.2d 411 (1957)). The court stated, "Tort remedies may not be waived in an unknowing exchange of forms. . . . An actual bargain must be made by those responsible for the transaction." Id.

There is an obvious difference between SRP and this case. SRP involved a purchase agreement negotiated by two commercial entities; this case does not. This difference, however, does not qualify the Cowboy Adventures covenant for less rigorous scrutiny than the covenant in SRP. When the SRP court broadly stated the law's disfavor of contractual provisions immunizing a party from the consequences of its own torts, the court did not limit its disfavor to commercial contracts. To the contrary, the court stated, "[C]ourts take the most relaxed view when the parties are business entities." Id. at 383, 694 P.2d at 213. The court left unstated what a "less relaxed view" would entail when, as here, the covenanting parties are not both business entities. To resolve the issues the Morganteens present, however, it suffices to infer, as the Sirek and Maurer courts implicitly inferred, that, at a minimum, the SRP standards must be satisfied.

The SRP court did not announce a rule of absolute disfavor for prospective exculpatory covenants in cases such as this. Nor do the Morganteens contend for such a rule. Nor do the Morganteens argue that the Cowboy Adventures covenant is unenforceable as a matter of law. They argue only that its enforceability turns upon questions of fact that require reversal of summary judgment. Confining ourselves to that issue, we agree.

We return to the supreme court's observation in SRP that tort remedies may not be waived unknowingly. "An actual bargain must be made" to establish an "intentional relinquishment of a known right." Id. at 385, 694 P.2d at 225. Here, the evidence did not permit the trial court to find as a matter of law that either a bargain or an intentional relinquishment occurred. To establish a waiver, Cowboy Adventures emphasizes that its release form instructed the Morganteens in boldface print that they were giving up their right to sue for damages and that their signatures constituted a promise not to sue. We do not believe, however, that SRP permits the conclusion that one's signature on a preprinted release may be construed as a matter of law as an intentional relinquishment of a known right.

Further, although the Cowboy Adventures covenant (in contrast to the Maurer covenant) expressly described the risk that ultimately confronted the plaintiff the risk of being bucked from a horse there is an incongruity among other clauses relating to the negligence of wranglers. Paragraph 5 releases "the Releasees from any claim that such Releasees are or may be negligent in connection with . . . instruction on riding skills or leading and supervising riders," and Paragraph 6 indemnifies the stable and its employees from liability "arising out of . . . any acts or omissions of wranglers." But Paragraph 7 obliges a rider "to abide by and follow any instructions given . . . by the . . . wranglers with regard to my use of my horse." The Morganteens define as an issue of fact whether "Mrs. Morganteen 'understood and accepted' that she must both follow the wrangler's advice and release him [from liability] if the advice was negligent." We agree that this question could not be resolved against the Morganteens as a matter of law.

For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the summary judgment that the trial court entered in favor of Cowboy Adventures and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

______________________________ NOEL FIDEL, Judge

CONCURRING:

_________________________________ E. G. NOYES, JR., Presiding Judge

_________________________________ WILLIAM F. GARBARINO, Judge

EXHIBIT A COWBOY ADVENTURES RIDING STABLE RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY, ASSUMPTION OF RISK, AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT

BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, YOU ARE GIVING UP CERTAIN LEGAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO RECOVER DAMAGES IN CASE OF INJURY, DEATH OR PROPERTY DAMAGE.

READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING IT. YOUR SIGNATURE INDICATES YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF AND AGREEMENT TO ITS TERMS.

I, ________________________________ (hereinafter the "Undersigned") reside at ____________________________, in _________________, ____.

On behalf of myself, my personal representatives, heirs, next-of-kin, spouse and assigns, I HEREBY:

1. Acknowledge that a horse may, without warning or any apparent cause, buck, stumble, fall, rear, bite, kick, run, make unpredictable movements, spook, jump obstacles, step on a person's feet, push or shove a person, saddles or bridles may loosen or break — all of which may cause the rider to fall or be jolted, resulting in serious injury or death.

2. Acknowledge that horseback riding is a dangerous activity and involves RISKS that may cause SERIOUS INJURY AND IN SOME CASES DEATH, because of the unpredictable nature and irrational behavior of horses, regardless of their training and past performance.

3. Voluntarily assume the risk and danger of injury or death inherent in the use of the horse, equipment and gear provided to me by Stable.

4. RELEASE, DISCHARGE AND PROMISE NOT TO SUE the Stable, doing business under its own name or any other name and/or any of its owners, officers, employees and agents (hereinafter the "Releasees"), for any loss, liability, damage, or cost whatsoever arising out of or related to any loss, damage, or injury (including death) to my person or property.

5. Release the Releasees from any claim that such Releasees are or may be negligent in connection with my riding experience or ability including but not limited to training or selecting horses, maintenance, care, fit or adjustment of saddles or bridles, instruction on riding skills or leading and supervising riders.

6. INDEMNIFY, AND SAVE AND HOLD HARMLESS the Stable and its employees and agents from and against any loss, liability, damage or cost they may incur arising out of or in any way connected with either my use of the horse and any equipment or gear provided therewith or any acts or omissions of wranglers or other employees or agents.

7. Agree to abide by and follow any instructions given or rules established by the Stable or any of its employees, guides or wranglers with regard to my use of the horse or any equipment or gear provided therewith.

8. The Undersigned expressly agrees that the foregoing release and waiver of liability, assumption of risk, and indemnity agreement is governed by the State of Arizona and is intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by Arizona law, and that in the event any portion of this Agreement is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the balance of the Agreement shall not be affected or impaired in an way and shall continue in full legal force and effect.

9. Acknowledge that this document is a contract and agree that if a lawsuit is filed against the Stable or its owners, agents, employees, guides or wrangles for any injury or damage in breach of this contract, the Undersigned will pay all attorney's fees and costs incurred by the Stable in defending such an action.

I HAVE READ THIS DOCUMENT. I UNDERSTAND IT IS A PROMISE NOT TO SUE AND A RELEASE AND INDEMNITY FOR ALL CLAIMS.

_______________ ______________________________ DATE SIGNATURE

App. 1

* * * * *

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU AND ALL RIDERS WEAR A PROTECTIVE HELMET. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT A PROTECTIVE HELMET IS AVAILABLE AND HAS BEEN OFFERED FOR MY OWN OR ANY MINOR'S SAFETY, ANY I HEREBY REFUSE TO USE IT.

Signature ______________________ For (minor) ___________________

* * * * *

Do you (or your child) have any history of epileptic seizures, heart condition or any other medical problem that could be affected by horseback riding? YES [ ] NO [ ]

* * * * *

$1,000 ACCIDENTAL MEDICAL EXPENSE — $50 Deductible per person.

I DO NOT wish to be covered for accidental medical expense while participating in the above horse back riding activities. (Initial) ________

* * * * * PARENT/GUARDIAN WAIVER — FOR MINOR

If the person who is to enter into this agreement (referred to as the "Undersigned" above) is under eighteen (18) years of age, his/her parent or guardian must read and sign the following:

I, __________________________, acting as parent, natural guardian or legal guardian of _______________________ (hereinafter "the minor") hereby affirms that he/she had read the Agreement, understands the Agreement and understands that the Agreement is a release of all claims for injury, death and property damage, and understands and consents to the terms on behalf of him/herself and on behalf of the minor, and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless the Releasees from any loss, liability, damage, or cost they may incur because of any defect in or lack of capacity to act on behalf of minor in executing this Agreement.

Parent/Guardian ____________________________

My ability as a horseback rider is (check one — be honest!):

_______ NEVER RIDDEN (never rode before or only rode 2 or 3 times)

_______ BEGINNER (ridden a few times, never had any lessons)

_______ INTERMEDIATE (ridden quite often, had some lessons)

_______ ADVANCED (ride regularly, had extensive lessons) (I acknowledge that I can canter on a horse and can handle any situation and circumstance on a horse.)

This Risk Release Form Approved for General Use by the Western Stable Owners Association — ____101 (01/01/90)

App. 2

COWBOY ADVENTURES RIDING STABLE RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY, ASSUMPTION OF RISK, AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT

BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, YOU ARE GIVING UP CERTAIN LEGAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO RECOVER DAMAGES IN CASE OF INJURY, DEATH OR PROPERTY DAMAGE.

READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING IT. YOUR SIGNATURE INDICATES YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF AND AGREEMENT TO ITS TERMS.

I, ________________________________ (hereinafter the "Undersigned") reside at ____________________________, in _________________, ____.

On behalf of myself, my personal representatives, heirs, next-of-kin, spouse and assigns, I HEREBY:

1. Acknowledge that a horse may, without warning or any apparent cause, buck, stumble, fall, rear, bite, kick, run, make unpredictable movements, spook, jump obstacles, step on a person's feet, push or shove a person, saddles or bridles may loosen or break — all of which may cause the rider to fall or be jolted, resulting in serious injury or death.

2. Acknowledge that horseback riding is a dangerous activity and involves RISKS that may cause SERIOUS INJURY AND IN SOME CASES DEATH, because of the unpredictable nature and irrational behavior of horses, regardless of their training and past performance.

3. Voluntarily assume the risk and danger of injury or death inherent in the use of the horse, equipment and gear provided to me by Stable.

4. RELEASE, DISCHARGE AND PROMISE NOT TO SUE the Stable, doing business under its own name or any other name and/or any of its owners, officers, employees and agents (hereinafter the "Releasees"), for any loss, liability, damage, or cost whatsoever arising out of or related to any loss, damage, or injury (including death) to my person or property.

5. Release the Releasees from any claim that such Releasees are or may be negligent in connection with my riding experience or ability including but not limited to training or selecting horses, maintenance, care, fit or adjustment of saddles or bridles, instruction on riding skills or leading and supervising riders.

6. INDEMNIFY, AND SAVE AND HOLD HARMLESS the Stable and its employees and agents from and against any loss, liability, damage or cost they may incur arising out of or in any way connected with either my use of the horse and any equipment or gear provided therewith or any acts or omissions of wranglers or other employees or agents.

7. Agree to abide by and follow any instructions given or rules established by the Stable or any of its employees, guides or wranglers with regard to my use of the horse or any equipment or gear provided therewith.

8. The Undersigned expressly agrees that the foregoing release and waiver of liability, assumption of risk, and indemnity agreement is governed by the State of Arizona and is intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by Arizona law, and that in the event any portion of this agreement is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the balance of the Agreement shall not be affected or impaired in an way and shall continue in full legal force and effect.

9. Acknowledge that this document is a contract and agree that if a lawsuit is filed against the Stable or its owners, agents, employees, guides or wrangles for any injury or damage in breach of this contract, the Undersigned will pay all attorney's fees and costs incurred by the Stable in defending such an action.

I HAVE READ THIS DOCUMENT. I UNDERSTAND IT IS A PROMISE NOT TO SUE AND A RELEASE AND INDEMNITY FOR ALL CLAIMS.

_______________ ______________________________ DATE SIGNATURE

App. 3

* * * * *

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU AND ALL RIDERS WEAR A PROTECTIVE HELMET. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT A PROTECTIVE HELMET IS AVAILABLE AND HAS BEEN OFFERED FOR MY OWN OR ANY MINOR'S SAFETY, ANY I HEREBY REFUSE TO USE IT.

Signature ______________________ For (minor) ___________________

* * * * *

Do you (or your child) have any history of epileptic seizures, heart condition or any other medical problem that could be affected by horseback riding? YES [ ] NO [ ]

* * * * *

$1,000 ACCIDENTAL MEDICAL EXPENSE — $50 Deductible per person.

I DO NOT wish to be covered for accidental medical expense while participating in the above horse back riding activities. (Initial) ________

* * * * * PARENT/GUARDIAN WAIVER — FOR MINOR

If the person who is to enter into this agreement (referred to as the "Undersigned" above) is under eighteen (18) years of age, his/her parent or guardian must read and sign the following:

I, __________________________, acting as parent, natural guardian or legal guardian of _______________________ (hereinafter "the minor") hereby affirms that he/she had read the Agreement, understands the Agreement and understands that the Agreement is a release of all claims for injury, death and property damage, and understands and consents to the terms on behalf of him/herself and on behalf of the minor, and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless the Releasees from any loss, liability, damage, or cost they may incur because of any defect in or lack of capacity to act on behalf of minor in executing this Agreement.

Parent/Guardian ____________________________

My ability as a horseback rider is (check one — be honest!):

_______ NEVER RIDDEN (never rode before or only rode 2 or 3 times)

_______ BEGINNER (ridden a few times, never had any lessons)

_______ INTERMEDIATE (ridden quite often, had some lessons)

_______ ADVANCED (ride regularly, had extensive lessons) (I acknowledge that I can canter on a horse and can handle any situation and circumstance on a horse.)

This Risk Release Form Approved for General Use by the Western Stable Owners Association — ____101 (01/01/90)

App. 4


Summaries of

Morganteen v. Cowboy Adventures, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One
Aug 28, 1997
190 Ariz. 463 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997)

holding that factual issues concerning the scope of the release precluded summary judgment for defendant

Summary of this case from Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc.

reversing summary judgment for defendant where question of fact existed as to whether parties actually bargained for the liability waiver

Summary of this case from Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc.
Case details for

Morganteen v. Cowboy Adventures, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GERALDINE AND JAMES MORGANTEEN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One

Date published: Aug 28, 1997

Citations

190 Ariz. 463 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997)
949 P.2d 552

Citing Cases

Lindsay v. Cave Creek Outfitters

Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., 192 Ariz. 313, 315, ¶ 2, 965 P.2d 47, 49 (App. 1998). II. Immunity Under §…

Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc.

1997) (holding that court may rule on defense of assumption of risk without presenting it to jury even when…