From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Dec 28, 2018
Case No. CIV-18-1080-D (W.D. Okla. Dec. 28, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-18-1080-D

12-28-2018

DAVID BRIAN MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant(s).


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, a prisoner appearing pro se, has filed this action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 alleging various violations of his constitutional rights. Pursuant to an order entered by United States District Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti, this matter has been referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1)(B).

On November 20, 2018, the undersigned entered an order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (ECF No. 16), but ordered Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $54.94. Plaintiff's deadline for submitting said payment was December 10, 2018. Plaintiff was advised that he could voluntarily dismiss this action in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) on or before December 10, 2018, without incurring any fees or costs. Plaintiff was further cautioned that the undersigned would recommend that the action be dismissed without prejudice if Plaintiff failed to comply with his obligation to make the initial partial payment or show cause in writing for the failure to pay by the specified date.

As of this date, Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee as required. Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Amend (ECF No. 17), but has failed to specifically respond to the Court's Order. Thus, the action is subject to dismissal without prejudice to re-filing. Local Civil Rule 3.4(a); See Cosby v. Meadors, 351 F.3d 1324, 1326-33 (10th Cir. 2003) (upholding dismissal of civil rights complaint based on noncompliance with orders requiring installments on the filing fee or to show cause for the failure to pay). See also Kennedy v. Reid, No. 06-1075, 208 Fed. Appx. 678 (10th Cir. Dec. 13, 2006) (finding no abuse of discretion in district court's dismissal without prejudice of section 1983 action due to litigant's failure to timely pay initial filing fee); Campanella v. Utah County Jail, Nos. 02-4183, 02-4215, 02-4235, 78 Fed. Appx. 72, 73 (10th Cir. Oct. 10, 2003) (same). Moreover, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) a district court may dismiss an action because the plaintiff fails to comply with a court order requiring partial payments. Cosby, 351 F.3d at 1327.

RECOMMENDATION

In light of the foregoing, the undersigned hereby recommends that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the initial filing fee as ordered by the Court. Adoption of this recommendation will moot the Plaintiff's Motions (ECF Nos. 14, 15 and 17). Plaintiff is advised that any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before January 14, 2019, in accordance with 28 U.S.C § 636 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. Failure to make timely objection to this Report and Recommendation waives the right to appellate review of both the factual findings and the legal issues decided herein. Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010).

This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter.

ENTERED on December 28, 2018.

/s/_________

SHON T. ERWIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Morgan v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Dec 28, 2018
Case No. CIV-18-1080-D (W.D. Okla. Dec. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Morgan v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BRIAN MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Dec 28, 2018

Citations

Case No. CIV-18-1080-D (W.D. Okla. Dec. 28, 2018)