From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. Samford

U.S.
Aug 5, 1982
458 U.S. 1122 (1982)

Summary

stating the general rule "that the question of whether a person is a real party in interest under Rule 17 is decided by the substantive law of the forum which created the right being sued upon"

Summary of this case from People of State of Ill. v. Life of Mid-America

Opinion

No. 81-1888.

August 5, 1982, OCTOBER TERM, 1981.


C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 53. Reported below: 665 F. 2d 598.


Summaries of

Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. Samford

U.S.
Aug 5, 1982
458 U.S. 1122 (1982)

stating the general rule "that the question of whether a person is a real party in interest under Rule 17 is decided by the substantive law of the forum which created the right being sued upon"

Summary of this case from People of State of Ill. v. Life of Mid-America

refusing to apply continuing violation theory where complaint alleged that employer continued to use discriminatory eligibility lists but failed to allege specific instances of discrimination resulting from that use

Summary of this case from Rogan v. Giant Eagle, Inc.
Case details for

Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. Samford

Case Details

Full title:MORGAN DRIVE AWAY, INC., ET AL. v. SAMFORD ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Aug 5, 1982

Citations

458 U.S. 1122 (1982)

Citing Cases

Sochor v. Florida

[4] Striking one aggravating factor when there are no mitigating circumstances does not necessarily require…

Lowery v. State

"[A]rticle 1, Section 18 of the Indiana Constitution is an admonition to the legislative branch of the state…