From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moretz v. Ray

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1876
75 N.C. 170 (N.C. 1876)

Opinion

June Term, 1876.

Register of Deeds — Official Bonds.

An action cannot be maintain on the official bond of the register of deeds for issuing a license to marry a girl under eighteen years of age without the written consent of her father or mother. The remedy of the plaintiff is either by indictment or an action for damages against the register of deeds individually.

ACTION to recover a penalty upon the official bond of the register of deeds, tried before Furches, J., at Fall Term, 1875, of ASHE.

The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that the defendant Ray is the register of deeds for the county of Ashe and that the other defendants are the sureties on his official bond in the penal sum of five thousand dollars.

That the defendant E. C. Bartlett is acting deputy register for said Ray in his said office.

That said defendant Ray, by his deputy Bartlett, on 11 March, (171) 1873, did issue a license, by virtue of his said office, to any minister of the gospel or to any justice of the peace of said county, to solemnize the rites of matrimony between one George Clawson and Alice Moretz, both of Watauga County; that the said Alice is the daughter of the plaintiff, and was at the time of issuing said license under the age of eighteen, and living with the plaintiff; and that said license was issued without the written consent of the plaintiff or his wife, and against the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and to the great damage of the plaintiff.

That by reason of the unlawful issuing of said license the defendants are liable on the official bond of the defendant Ray, register as aforesaid, in the sum of two hundred dollars.

Wherefore, the plaintiff demands judgment for five thousand dollars, to be discharged upon the payment of two hundred dollars, etc.

The defendants demurred, because:

That there was a misjoinder of parties;

That the complaint does not show that the sureties, E. C. Bartlett, L. C. Gentry and John Dickson, ever gave any bond or other obligation as sureties;

That the demand does not exceed two hundred dollars, and is, therefore, under the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace;

That the complaint alleges that the license was issued to George Clawson to marry his own daughter without alleging that the defendant knew the fact;

That the complaint does not allege that the defendants knew of the said Alice's being under the age of eighteen.

His Honor sustained the demurrer and gave judgment against the plaintiff for costs.

From this judgment the plaintiff appealed.

Smith Strong for appellant. (172)

Folk Armfield, contra.


This case comes up to this Court on a demurrer to the complaint. Neither the bond of the register of deeds is set out in the complaint or the conditions thereof, so that the Court can see that any breach has been committed, or even that the bond required by law has been executed by the defendants.

Waiving all this, however, and assuming that the usual register's bond has been filed by the defendants, we have decided at this term of the Court, Holt v. McLean, 347 post, the facts of which are almost identical with this, that an action on the bond cannot be maintained. The remedy of the plaintiff is either by indictment or an action for damages against the register of deeds individually.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited: Kivett v. Young, 106 N.C. 569; Daniel v. Grizzard, 117 N.C. 108; Hudson v. McArthur, 152 N.C. 455.


Summaries of

Moretz v. Ray

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1876
75 N.C. 170 (N.C. 1876)
Case details for

Moretz v. Ray

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIAN MORETZ v. G. W. RAY AND OTHERS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1876

Citations

75 N.C. 170 (N.C. 1876)

Citing Cases

Kivett v. Young

This Court did, in the past, so interpret the statute and like conditions in other classes of official bonds.…

Daniel v. Grizzard

At the time defendants executed the bond they would not have been liable for failing to index the mortgage to…