From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moreno v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 17, 1995
70 F.3d 433 (6th Cir. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-1231, 94-1247.

November 17, 1995.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.


Summaries of

Moreno v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 17, 1995
70 F.3d 433 (6th Cir. 1995)
Case details for

Moreno v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Charles MORENO, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Nov 17, 1995

Citations

70 F.3d 433 (6th Cir. 1995)

Citing Cases

Tyler v. City of Manhattan

"The pre-Franklin cases thus have limited applicability." Moreno v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 63 F.3d 1404,…

Moreno v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

A majority of the active judges of this court then voted to rehear the case en banc, thereby vacating the…