From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moran v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 8, 1996
224 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.).


Petitioner's excuse for not filing a timely notice of claim — that he did not realize the seriousness of his injury until after the 90-day period had expired and was thereafter physically incapacitated from doing so until he made the instant motion some six and a half months after the incident — cannot be accepted in the absence of any supporting medical documentation ( compare, Matter of Green v. New York City Hous. Auth., 180 A.D.2d 586, 587, with Heiman v. City of New York, 85 A.D.2d 25). It is also clear that the delay, by preventing respondent from obtaining a prompt hearing and medical examination of petitioner, significantly diminished its ability to determine the extent of petitioner's injuries and any changes in his condition over time ( see, Matter of Robertson v. City of New York, 146 A.D.2d 456, 457, affd 74 N.Y.2d 781).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Moran v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 8, 1996
224 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Moran v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK MORAN et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 8, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 698

Citing Cases

Morris v. City of N.Y.

Moreover, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the delay of approximately four months after the…

Montero v. City of New York

Petitioner's assertion that he was unaware of the requirement that he file a notice of claim within 90 days…