From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. City of San Rafael

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 25, 1997
108 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 1997)

Opinion

No. 94-15523

Filed March 25, 1997

D.C. No. CV-87-05277-CW

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Stephen Reinhardt, and Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Filed January 13, 1997

The opinion filed September 6, 1996, is amended as follows:

1) In the reported opinion, at 96 F.3d 359, 363 (9th Cir. 1996), add the following sentence to the end of the first partial paragraph:

"Nominal damages" is not limited to an award in the amount of $1, but includes an award that may properly be classified as "de minimis."

With this amendment to the opinion, a majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor or rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.


Summaries of

Morales v. City of San Rafael

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 25, 1997
108 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 1997)
Case details for

Morales v. City of San Rafael

Case Details

Full title:JUAN MANUEL MORALES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN RAFAEL and DANIEL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 25, 1997

Citations

108 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

Herrera-Amaya v. Arizona

However, Farrar only directs a court to consider the extent of success of the prevailing party; the Farrar…